Perform code optimization and document cleanup (#1)
check / check (ubuntu-latest) (push) Successful in 2m5s
check / check (macos-latest) (push) Has been cancelled
check-online / check-online (ubuntu-latest) (push) Successful in 1m53s

## Summary
- add repository-wide quality tooling and verification scaffolding, including CI workflows, pnpm workspace setup, ESLint/Prettier/markdown checks, and generated-output verification helpers
- reorganize skill sources and generation flow by introducing canonical `_source` variants, generator/manifests, reusable helper abstractions, and shared web-automation/browser utilities
- clean up and expand documentation so the root README flows into docs and skill docs, with clearer development, reviewer, installer, and workflow guidance

## Notable changes
- docs flow and consistency cleanup across `README.md`, `docs/README.md`, and related docs
- new scripts for `check`, docs verification, generated-file verification, shell portability, and safe directory replacement
- refactors in Atlassian and web-automation skill runtimes to reduce duplication and centralize reusable code
- changelog, development documentation, and CI surface updates

## Test Plan
- [ ] `pnpm run check`
- [ ] review generated/manifests and skill sync outputs
- [ ] smoke-check docs flow from `README.md` to `docs/README.md` to skill docs

## Notes
- this branch currently includes tracked `skills/web-automation/shared/node_modules` content that should be reviewed carefully as potentially noisy/accidental committed artifacts

Co-authored-by: Stefano Fiorini <stefano.fiorini@firsthorizon.com>
Reviewed-on: #1
This commit was merged in pull request #1.
This commit is contained in:
2026-05-04 04:41:34 +00:00
parent 2deab1c1b4
commit 251148c3ff
373 changed files with 28504 additions and 1281 deletions
+18 -10
View File
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ name: implement-plan
description: Use when a plan folder (from create-plan) exists and needs to be executed in an isolated git worktree with iterative cross-model milestone review. ALWAYS invoke when user says "implement the plan", "execute the plan", "start implementation", "resume the plan", or similar execution requests.
---
<!-- ⚠️ GENERATED FILE do not edit directly. Edit the canonical source in skills/implement-plan/_source/claude-code/ and run `pnpm run sync:pi`. -->
# Implement Plan (Claude Code)
Execute an existing plan (created by `create-plan`) in an isolated git worktree, with iterative cross-model review at each milestone boundary.
@@ -10,6 +12,7 @@ Execute an existing plan (created by `create-plan`) in an isolated git worktree,
## Prerequisite Check (MANDATORY)
Required:
- Plan folder exists under `ai_plan/` at project root
- `continuation-runbook.md` exists in plan folder
- `milestone-plan.md` exists in plan folder
@@ -63,7 +66,6 @@ Store `REVIEWER_CLI`, `REVIEWER_MODEL`, and `MAX_ROUNDS`. These values are fixed
Reviewer CLI: `codex`, `claude`, `cursor`, `opencode`, `pi`, or `skip`.
If `REVIEWER_CLI=pi`, verify the Pi reviewer binary before entering the review loop:
```bash
@@ -101,6 +103,7 @@ Mark first story `in-dev` in `story-tracker.md`.
#### Step 3: Implement Stories
Execute each story in order. After completing each story:
1. Mark `in-dev` -> `completed` in `story-tracker.md`
2. Update counts
3. Mark next story `in-dev`
@@ -135,6 +138,7 @@ git commit -m "feat(<scope>): implement milestone M<N> - <description>"
```
Do NOT push. After committing:
1. Backfill the commit hash into the Notes column for all stories in this milestone in `story-tracker.md`.
2. Mark milestone as `approved` in `story-tracker.md`.
3. Move to next milestone.
@@ -150,6 +154,7 @@ REVIEW_ID=$(uuidgen | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | head -c 8)
```
Use `REVIEW_ID` for all milestone review temp file paths:
- `/tmp/milestone-${REVIEW_ID}.md`
- `/tmp/milestone-review-${REVIEW_ID}.md`
- `/tmp/milestone-review-${REVIEW_ID}.json`
@@ -226,6 +231,7 @@ VERDICT: APPROVED
```
Rules:
- Order findings from `P0` to `P3`.
- `P0` = total blocker, `P1` = major risk, `P2` = must-fix before approval, `P3` = cosmetic / nice to have.
- Use `- None.` when a severity has no findings.
@@ -248,7 +254,6 @@ Write the reviewer invocation to `/tmp/milestone-review-${REVIEW_ID}.sh` as a ba
set -euo pipefail
```
**If `REVIEWER_CLI` is `pi`:**
Fresh call every round (Pi reviewer calls do not use session resume):
@@ -389,6 +394,7 @@ fi
Run the helper in the foreground and watch its live stdout for `state=in-progress` heartbeats. If your agent environment buffers command output until exit, start the helper in the background and poll `/tmp/milestone-review-${REVIEW_ID}.status` separately instead of treating heartbeats as post-hoc-only data.
After the command completes:
- If `REVIEWER_CLI=cursor`, extract the final review text:
```bash
@@ -414,14 +420,14 @@ Fallback is allowed only when the helper is missing or not executable.
- `/tmp/milestone-review-${REVIEW_ID}.runner.out`
3. Present review to the user:
```
```markdown
## Milestone Review — Round N (reviewer: ${REVIEWER_CLI} / ${REVIEWER_MODEL})
[Reviewer feedback]
```
4. While the reviewer is still running, keep waiting as long as fresh `state=in-progress note="In progress N"` heartbeats continue to appear roughly once per minute.
5. Check verdict:
1. While the reviewer is still running, keep waiting as long as fresh `state=in-progress note="In progress N"` heartbeats continue to appear roughly once per minute.
2. Check verdict:
- **VERDICT: APPROVED** with no `P0`, `P1`, or `P2` findings -> proceed to Phase 4 Step 6 (commit & approve)
- **VERDICT: APPROVED** with only `P3` findings -> optionally fix the `P3` items if they are cheap and safe, then proceed
- **VERDICT: REVISE** or any `P0`, `P1`, or `P2` finding -> go to Step 5
@@ -438,7 +444,7 @@ Fallback is allowed only when the helper is missing or not executable.
Summarize revisions for the user:
```
```markdown
### Revisions (Round N)
- [Change and reason, one bullet per issue addressed]
```
@@ -449,7 +455,6 @@ If a revision contradicts the user's explicit requirements, skip it and note it
Rewrite `/tmp/milestone-review-${REVIEW_ID}.sh` for the next round. The script should contain the reviewer invocation only; do not run it directly.
**If `REVIEWER_CLI` is `pi`:**
Fresh call with prior-round context (Pi reviewer calls do not use session resume):
@@ -559,20 +564,20 @@ After all milestones are approved and committed:
git merge implement/<plan-folder-name>
```
4. Delete the worktree and its branch:
1. Delete the worktree and its branch:
```bash
git worktree remove <worktree-path>
git branch -d implement/<plan-folder-name>
```
5. Mark plan status as `completed` in `story-tracker.md`.
1. Mark plan status as `completed` in `story-tracker.md`.
### Phase 7: Final Report
Present summary:
```
```markdown
## Implementation Complete
**Plan:** <plan-folder-name>
@@ -598,6 +603,7 @@ fi
```
Rules:
- Telegram is the only supported notification path. Do not use desktop notifications, `say`, email, or any other notifier.
- Notification failures are non-blocking, but they must be surfaced to the user.
- Before stopping for any user interaction, approval, or manual decision, send a Telegram summary first if configured.
@@ -608,12 +614,14 @@ Rules:
**ALWAYS update `story-tracker.md` before/after each story. NEVER proceed with stale tracker state.**
Before starting any story:
1. Open `story-tracker.md`
2. Mark story `in-dev`
3. Add notes if relevant
4. Then begin implementation
After completing any story:
1. Mark story `completed`
2. Review pending stories
3. Update Last Updated and Stories Complete counts