feat(M2): Documentation flow, accuracy, consistency cleanup, and cross-platform shell portability
This commit is contained in:
Stefano Fiorini
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ Create and maintain a local plan folder under `ai_plan/` at project root.
|
||||
This Claude Code variant depends on Superpowers planning skills and explicit sub-skill invocation.
|
||||
|
||||
Required:
|
||||
|
||||
- Superpowers repo: `https://github.com/obra/superpowers`
|
||||
- `brainstorming` skill
|
||||
- `writing-plans` skill
|
||||
@@ -23,10 +24,12 @@ If any dependency is missing, stop immediately and return:
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Analyze
|
||||
|
||||
- Explore the codebase with exploration agents.
|
||||
- Understand existing patterns and context.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Gather Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- Ask questions ONE AT A TIME until user says ready.
|
||||
- Cover scope, constraints, success criteria, dependencies.
|
||||
- Summarize before proceeding.
|
||||
@@ -45,7 +48,6 @@ For shorthand `pi/<pi-model-name>`, split only on the first slash when the prefi
|
||||
|
||||
When `REVIEWER_CLI=pi`, the reviewer model is configured independently from the model running this workflow. If the model/provider is unavailable, surface helper stderr/status and use `pi --list-models [search]` to inspect configured models.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
If the user has already specified a reviewer CLI and model (e.g., "create a plan, review with codex o4-mini"), use those values. Otherwise, ask:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Which CLI should review the plan?**
|
||||
@@ -66,11 +68,13 @@ If the user has already specified a reviewer CLI and model (e.g., "create a plan
|
||||
Store the chosen `REVIEWER_CLI`, `REVIEWER_MODEL`, and `MAX_ROUNDS` for Phase 6 (Iterative Plan Review).
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Design (REQUIRED SUB-SKILL)
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke `superpowers:brainstorming` explicitly.
|
||||
- Present 2-3 approaches and recommend one.
|
||||
- Validate design in sections.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Plan (REQUIRED SUB-SKILL)
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke `superpowers:writing-plans` explicitly.
|
||||
- Break into milestones and bite-sized stories (2-5 min each).
|
||||
- Story IDs: `S-{milestone}{sequence}`.
|
||||
@@ -88,6 +92,7 @@ REVIEW_ID=$(uuidgen | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | head -c 8)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Use for temp artifacts:
|
||||
|
||||
- `/tmp/plan-${REVIEW_ID}.md`
|
||||
- `/tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.md`
|
||||
- `/tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.json` (Cursor only)
|
||||
@@ -143,6 +148,7 @@ VERDICT: APPROVED
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- Order findings from `P0` to `P3`.
|
||||
- `P0` = total blocker, `P1` = major risk, `P2` = must-fix before approval, `P3` = cosmetic / nice to have.
|
||||
- Use `- None.` when a severity has no findings.
|
||||
@@ -165,7 +171,6 @@ Write the reviewer invocation to `/tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.sh` as a bash sc
|
||||
set -euo pipefail
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
**If `REVIEWER_CLI` is `pi`:**
|
||||
|
||||
Fresh call every round (Pi reviewer calls do not use session resume):
|
||||
@@ -298,6 +303,7 @@ fi
|
||||
Run the helper in the foreground and watch its live stdout for `state=in-progress` heartbeats. If your agent environment buffers command output until exit, start the helper in the background and poll `/tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.status` separately instead of treating heartbeats as post-hoc-only data.
|
||||
|
||||
After the command completes:
|
||||
|
||||
- If `REVIEWER_CLI=cursor`, extract the final review text:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
@@ -323,14 +329,14 @@ Fallback is allowed only when the helper is missing or not executable.
|
||||
- `/tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.runner.out`
|
||||
3. Present review to the user:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Plan Review — Round N (reviewer: ${REVIEWER_CLI} / ${REVIEWER_MODEL})
|
||||
|
||||
[Reviewer feedback]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. While the reviewer is still running, keep waiting as long as fresh `state=in-progress note="In progress N"` heartbeats continue to appear roughly once per minute.
|
||||
5. Check verdict:
|
||||
1. While the reviewer is still running, keep waiting as long as fresh `state=in-progress note="In progress N"` heartbeats continue to appear roughly once per minute.
|
||||
2. Check verdict:
|
||||
- **VERDICT: APPROVED** with no `P0`, `P1`, or `P2` findings → proceed to Phase 7 (Initialize workspace)
|
||||
- **VERDICT: APPROVED** with only `P3` findings → optionally fix the `P3` items if they are cheap and safe, then proceed
|
||||
- **VERDICT: REVISE** or any `P0`, `P1`, or `P2` finding → go to Step 5
|
||||
@@ -345,7 +351,7 @@ Address the reviewer findings in priority order (`P0` → `P1` → `P2`, then `P
|
||||
|
||||
Summarize revisions for the user:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
### Revisions (Round N)
|
||||
- [Change and reason, one bullet per issue addressed]
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -356,7 +362,6 @@ If a revision contradicts the user's explicit requirements, skip it and note it
|
||||
|
||||
Rewrite `/tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.sh` for the next round. The script should contain the reviewer invocation only; do not run it directly.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
**If `REVIEWER_CLI` is `pi`:**
|
||||
|
||||
Fresh call with prior-round context (Pi reviewer calls do not use session resume):
|
||||
@@ -440,7 +445,7 @@ Return to Step 4.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 7: Present Final Result
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Plan Review — Final (reviewer: ${REVIEWER_CLI} / ${REVIEWER_MODEL})
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** Approved after N round(s)
|
||||
@@ -467,21 +472,25 @@ If the round failed, produced empty output, or reached operator-decision timeout
|
||||
### Phase 7: Initialize Local Plan Workspace (MANDATORY)
|
||||
|
||||
At project root:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Ensure `ai_plan/` exists. Create it if missing.
|
||||
2. Ensure `.gitignore` contains `/ai_plan/`.
|
||||
3. If `.gitignore` was changed, commit that change immediately (local commit only).
|
||||
|
||||
Recommended commit message:
|
||||
|
||||
- `chore(gitignore): ignore ai_plan local planning artifacts`
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 8: Generate Plan Files (MANDATORY - DO NOT SKIP)
|
||||
|
||||
**PLAN MODE CHECK:** If currently in plan mode:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Inform user that plan files cannot be written while in plan mode.
|
||||
2. Instruct user to exit plan mode (approve plan or use ExitPlanMode).
|
||||
3. Proceed with file generation only after exiting plan mode.
|
||||
|
||||
Create `ai_plan/YYYY-MM-DD-<short-title>/` with ALL files:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `original-plan.md` - Copy the plan file from `~/.claude/plans/` as-is.
|
||||
2. `final-transcript.md` - Copy of final planning transcript for reference.
|
||||
3. `milestone-plan.md` - Full specification (template-based).
|
||||
@@ -514,6 +523,7 @@ fi
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- Telegram is the only supported notification path. Do not use desktop notifications, `say`, email, or any other notifier.
|
||||
- Notification failures are non-blocking, but they must be surfaced to the user.
|
||||
- Before stopping for any user interaction, approval, or manual decision, send a Telegram summary first if configured.
|
||||
@@ -524,12 +534,14 @@ Rules:
|
||||
**ALWAYS update `story-tracker.md` before/after each story. NEVER proceed with stale tracker state.**
|
||||
|
||||
Before starting any story:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Open `story-tracker.md`
|
||||
2. Mark story `in-dev`
|
||||
3. Add notes if relevant
|
||||
4. Then begin implementation
|
||||
|
||||
After completing any story:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Mark story `completed`
|
||||
2. Add commit hash in Notes
|
||||
3. Review pending stories
|
||||
@@ -568,4 +580,5 @@ After completing any story:
|
||||
- [ ] Telegram notification attempted if configured
|
||||
|
||||
## Exit Triggers for Question Phase
|
||||
|
||||
User says: "ready", "done", "let's plan", "proceed", "enough questions"
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user