feat(M2): Documentation flow, accuracy, consistency cleanup, and cross-platform shell portability

This commit is contained in:
Stefano Fiorini
2026-05-03 20:14:44 -05:00
parent 0443381aa0
commit be993429c1
59 changed files with 1898 additions and 385 deletions
+16 -8
View File
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Create and maintain a local plan workspace under `ai_plan/` at project root.
## Overview
This skill wraps the current Superpowers flow for Codex:
1. Design first with `superpowers:brainstorming`
2. Then build an implementation plan with `superpowers:writing-plans`
3. Review the plan iteratively with a second model/provider
@@ -20,6 +21,7 @@ This skill wraps the current Superpowers flow for Codex:
## Prerequisite Check (MANDATORY)
Required:
- Superpowers skills symlink: `~/.agents/skills/superpowers -> ~/.codex/superpowers/skills`
- `superpowers:brainstorming`
- `superpowers:writing-plans`
@@ -50,9 +52,11 @@ If any dependency is missing, stop and return:
## Process
### Phase 1: Analyze
- Explore the codebase and existing patterns.
### Phase 2: Gather Requirements
- Ask questions one at a time until user says ready.
- Confirm scope, constraints, success criteria, dependencies.
@@ -70,7 +74,6 @@ For shorthand `pi/<pi-model-name>`, split only on the first slash when the prefi
When `REVIEWER_CLI=pi`, the reviewer model is configured independently from the model running this workflow. If the model/provider is unavailable, surface helper stderr/status and use `pi --list-models [search]` to inspect configured models.
If the user has already specified a reviewer CLI and model (e.g., "create a plan, review with claude sonnet"), use those values. Otherwise, ask:
1. **Which CLI should review the plan?**
@@ -111,6 +114,7 @@ REVIEW_ID=$(uuidgen | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | head -c 8)
```
Use for temp artifacts:
- `/tmp/plan-${REVIEW_ID}.md` - plan payload
- `/tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.md` - normalized review text presented to the user
- `/tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.json` - raw Cursor JSON (only for `cursor`)
@@ -166,6 +170,7 @@ VERDICT: APPROVED
```
Rules:
- Order findings from `P0` to `P3`.
- `P0` = total blocker, `P1` = major risk, `P2` = must-fix before approval, `P3` = cosmetic / nice to have.
- Use `- None.` when a severity has no findings.
@@ -188,7 +193,6 @@ Write the reviewer invocation to `/tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.sh` as a bash sc
set -euo pipefail
```
**If `REVIEWER_CLI` is `pi`:**
Fresh call every round (Pi reviewer calls do not use session resume):
@@ -321,6 +325,7 @@ fi
Run the helper in the foreground and watch its live stdout for `state=in-progress` heartbeats. If your agent environment buffers command output until exit, start the helper in the background and poll `/tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.status` separately instead of treating heartbeats as post-hoc-only data.
After the command completes:
- If `REVIEWER_CLI=cursor`, extract the final review text:
```bash
@@ -346,14 +351,14 @@ Fallback is allowed only when the helper is missing or not executable.
- `/tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.runner.out`
3. Present review to the user:
```
```markdown
## Plan Review — Round N (reviewer: ${REVIEWER_CLI} / ${REVIEWER_MODEL})
[Reviewer feedback]
```
4. While the reviewer is still running, keep waiting as long as fresh `state=in-progress note="In progress N"` heartbeats continue to appear roughly once per minute.
5. Check verdict:
1. While the reviewer is still running, keep waiting as long as fresh `state=in-progress note="In progress N"` heartbeats continue to appear roughly once per minute.
2. Check verdict:
- **VERDICT: APPROVED** with no `P0`, `P1`, or `P2` findings → proceed to Phase 7 (Initialize workspace)
- **VERDICT: APPROVED** with only `P3` findings → optionally fix the `P3` items if they are cheap and safe, then proceed
- **VERDICT: REVISE** or any `P0`, `P1`, or `P2` finding → go to Step 5
@@ -368,7 +373,7 @@ Address the reviewer findings in priority order (`P0` → `P1` → `P2`, then `P
Summarize revisions for the user:
```
```markdown
### Revisions (Round N)
- [Change and reason, one bullet per issue addressed]
```
@@ -379,7 +384,6 @@ If a revision contradicts the user's explicit requirements, skip it and note it
Rewrite `/tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.sh` for the next round. The script should contain the reviewer invocation only; do not run it directly.
**If `REVIEWER_CLI` is `pi`:**
Fresh call with prior-round context (Pi reviewer calls do not use session resume):
@@ -463,7 +467,7 @@ Return to Step 4.
#### Step 7: Present Final Result
```
```markdown
## Plan Review — Final (reviewer: ${REVIEWER_CLI} / ${REVIEWER_MODEL})
**Status:** Approved after N round(s)
@@ -490,16 +494,19 @@ If the round failed, produced empty output, or reached operator-decision timeout
### Phase 7: Initialize Local Plan Workspace (MANDATORY)
At project root:
1. Ensure `ai_plan/` exists. Create it if missing.
2. Ensure `.gitignore` contains `/ai_plan/`.
3. If `.gitignore` was changed, commit that change immediately (local commit only).
Recommended commit message:
- `chore(gitignore): ignore ai_plan local planning artifacts`
### Phase 8: Generate Plan Files (MANDATORY)
Create `ai_plan/YYYY-MM-DD-<short-title>/` with all files below:
1. `original-plan.md` - copy of original planner-generated plan.
2. `final-transcript.md` - copy of final planning transcript used to reach approved plan.
3. `milestone-plan.md` - full implementation spec (from template).
@@ -532,6 +539,7 @@ fi
```
Rules:
- Telegram is the only supported notification path. Do not use desktop notifications, `say`, email, or any other notifier.
- Notification failures are non-blocking, but they must be surfaced to the user.
- Before stopping for any user interaction, approval, or manual decision, send a Telegram summary first if configured.
@@ -65,15 +65,19 @@ Work from this folder (`ai_plan/YYYY-MM-DD-<short-title>/`) and always follow th
## Full Context Reproduction
### Project Overview
[What this project/feature is about]
### User Requirements
[All gathered requirements]
### Scope
[In scope / out of scope]
### Dependencies
[External dependencies, prerequisites, related systems]
---
@@ -81,16 +85,19 @@ Work from this folder (`ai_plan/YYYY-MM-DD-<short-title>/`) and always follow th
## Key Specifications
### Type Definitions
```typescript
// Copy-paste ready type definitions
```
### Enums & Constants
```typescript
// All enums/constants needed
```
### API Endpoints
```typescript
// Request/response shapes
```
@@ -108,16 +115,19 @@ Work from this folder (`ai_plan/YYYY-MM-DD-<short-title>/`) and always follow th
## Verification Commands
### Lint (changed files first)
```bash
# example: <lint-command> <changed-file-1> <changed-file-2>
```
### Typecheck
```bash
# example: <typecheck-command>
```
### Tests (target changed scope first)
```bash
# example: <test-command> <related spec/file>
```
@@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
# [Plan Title]
## Overview
- **Goal:** [One sentence describing the end state]
- **Created:** YYYY-MM-DD
- **Status:** In Progress | Complete
## Planning Guardrails
- This plan assumes design was validated before implementation planning.
- Skills are invoked via native discovery (Codex: `~/.agents/skills/`).
- Deprecated CLI wrappers (for example, `superpowers-codex bootstrap` / `use-skill`) are not part of this workflow.
@@ -14,37 +16,46 @@
## Context
### Requirements
[Gathered requirements from user questions]
### Constraints
[Technical, business, or timeline constraints]
### Success Criteria
[How we know this is complete]
## Architecture
### Design Decisions
[Key architectural choices and rationale]
### Component Relationships
[How pieces fit together]
### Data Flow
[How data moves through the system]
## Milestones
### M1: [Name]
**Description:** [What this milestone achieves]
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] [Criterion 1]
- [ ] [Criterion 2]
**Stories:** S-101, S-102, S-103...
**Milestone Completion Rule (MANDATORY):**
- Run lint/typecheck/tests for changed files.
- Commit locally (DO NOT push).
- Stop and ask user for feedback.
@@ -54,15 +65,18 @@
---
### M2: [Name]
**Description:** [What this milestone achieves]
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] [Criterion 1]
- [ ] [Criterion 2]
**Stories:** S-201, S-202, S-203...
**Milestone Completion Rule (MANDATORY):**
- Run lint/typecheck/tests for changed files.
- Commit locally (DO NOT push).
- Stop and ask user for feedback.
@@ -74,16 +88,19 @@
## Technical Specifications
### Types & Interfaces
```typescript
// Key type definitions (or equivalent language constructs)
```
### API Contracts
```typescript
// Endpoint signatures, request/response shapes (if applicable)
```
### Constants & Enums
```typescript
// Shared constants (if applicable)
```
@@ -100,6 +117,7 @@
## Related Plan Files
This file is part of the plan folder under `ai_plan/`:
- `original-plan.md` - Original approved plan (reference for original intent)
- `final-transcript.md` - Final planning transcript (reference for rationale/context)
- `milestone-plan.md` - This file (full specification)
@@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
# Story Tracker: [Plan Title]
## Progress Summary
- **Current Milestone:** M1
- **Stories Complete:** 0/N
- **Milestones Approved:** 0/M
- **Last Updated:** YYYY-MM-DD
## Tracking Guardrails
- Update status immediately when work starts (`in-dev`) and when work completes (`completed`).
- Require explicit user approval at each milestone boundary before continuing.
- Do not push until all milestones are approved and permission is explicitly granted.
@@ -52,15 +54,18 @@
## Update Instructions (MANDATORY)
Before starting any story:
1. Mark story as `in-dev`
2. Update "Last Updated"
After completing any story:
1. Mark story as `completed`
2. Add local commit hash to Notes
3. Update "Stories Complete" and "Last Updated"
At milestone boundary:
1. Run lint/typecheck/tests for changed files
2. Commit (no push)
3. Request feedback
@@ -69,4 +74,5 @@ At milestone boundary:
6. Continue only after approval
After all milestones approved:
- Ask permission to push and then mark plan completed.