ai-coding-skills/skills/create-plan/opencode/SKILL.md

name, description

name	description
create-plan	Use when starting a new feature, project, or complex task that needs structured planning with milestones, bite-sized stories, and resumable execution context in Opencode workflows. ALWAYS invoke when user says "create a plan", "make a plan", "plan this", "start planning", or similar planning requests.

Create Plan (OpenCode)

Create and maintain a local plan folder under ai_plan/ at project root.

Prerequisite Check (MANDATORY)

This OpenCode variant depends on Superpowers skills being installed via OpenCode's native skill system.

Required:

• Superpowers repo: https://github.com/obra/superpowers
• OpenCode Superpowers skills symlink: ~/.config/opencode/skills/superpowers
• superpowers/brainstorming
• superpowers/writing-plans

Verify before proceeding:

ls -l ~/.config/opencode/skills/superpowers

If dependencies are missing, stop immediately and return:

"Missing dependency: OpenCode Superpowers skills are required (superpowers/brainstorming, superpowers/writing-plans). Install from https://github.com/obra/superpowers (OpenCode setup), then retry."

Process

Phase 1: Bootstrap Superpowers Context (REQUIRED)

Use OpenCode's native skill tool:

• list skills
• verify superpowers/brainstorming and superpowers/writing-plans are discoverable

Phase 2: Analyze

• Explore the codebase and existing patterns.

Phase 3: Gather Requirements

• Ask questions ONE AT A TIME until user says ready.
• Cover scope, constraints, success criteria, dependencies.
• Summarize before proceeding.

Phase 4: Configure Reviewer

If the user has already specified a reviewer CLI and model (e.g., "create a plan, review with codex o4-mini"), use those values. Otherwise, ask:

1. Which CLI should review the plan?

   • codex — OpenAI Codex CLI (codex exec)
   • claude — Claude Code CLI (claude -p)
   • cursor — Cursor Agent CLI (cursor-agent -p)
   • skip — No external review, proceed directly to file generation

2. Which model? (only if a CLI was chosen)

   • For codex: default o4-mini, alternatives: gpt-5.3-codex, o3
   • For claude: default sonnet, alternatives: opus, haiku
   • For cursor: run cursor-agent models first to see your account's available models (availability varies by subscription)
   • Accept any model string the user provides

Store the chosen REVIEWER_CLI and REVIEWER_MODEL for Phase 7 (Iterative Plan Review).

Phase 5: Design (REQUIRED SUB-SKILL)

Use OpenCode's native skill tool to load:

• superpowers/brainstorming

Then present 2-3 approaches and recommend one.

Phase 6: Plan (REQUIRED SUB-SKILL)

Use OpenCode's native skill tool to load:

• superpowers/writing-plans

Then break into milestones and bite-sized stories (2-5 min each). Story IDs: S-{milestone}{sequence}.

Phase 7: Iterative Plan Review

Send the plan to the configured reviewer CLI for feedback. Revise and re-submit until approved (max 5 rounds).

Skip this phase entirely if reviewer was set to skip.

Step 1: Generate Session ID

REVIEW_ID=$(uuidgen | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | head -c 8)

Use for all temp file paths: /tmp/plan-${REVIEW_ID}.md and /tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.md.

Step 2: Write Plan to Temp File

Write the complete plan (milestones, stories, design decisions, specs) to /tmp/plan-${REVIEW_ID}.md.

Step 3: Submit to Reviewer (Round 1)

If REVIEWER_CLI is codex:

codex exec \
  -m ${REVIEWER_MODEL} \
  -s read-only \
  -o /tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.md \
  "Review the implementation plan in /tmp/plan-${REVIEW_ID}.md. Focus on:
1. Correctness — Will this plan achieve the stated goals?
2. Risks — What could go wrong? Edge cases? Data loss?
3. Missing steps — Is anything forgotten?
4. Alternatives — Is there a simpler or better approach?
5. Security — Any security concerns?

Be specific and actionable. If the plan is solid, end with exactly: VERDICT: APPROVED
If changes are needed, end with exactly: VERDICT: REVISE"

Capture the Codex session ID from output (line session id: <uuid>). Store as CODEX_SESSION_ID for session resume in subsequent rounds.

If REVIEWER_CLI is claude:

claude -p \
  "Read the file /tmp/plan-${REVIEW_ID}.md and review the implementation plan. Focus on:
1. Correctness — Will this plan achieve the stated goals?
2. Risks — What could go wrong? Edge cases? Data loss?
3. Missing steps — Is anything forgotten?
4. Alternatives — Is there a simpler or better approach?
5. Security — Any security concerns?

Be specific and actionable. If the plan is solid, end with exactly: VERDICT: APPROVED
If changes are needed, end with exactly: VERDICT: REVISE" \
  --model ${REVIEWER_MODEL} \
  --allowedTools Read \
  > /tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.md

If REVIEWER_CLI is cursor:

cursor-agent -p \
  --mode=ask \
  --model ${REVIEWER_MODEL} \
  --trust \
  --output-format json \
  "Read the file /tmp/plan-${REVIEW_ID}.md and review the implementation plan. Focus on:
1. Correctness — Will this plan achieve the stated goals?
2. Risks — What could go wrong? Edge cases? Data loss?
3. Missing steps — Is anything forgotten?
4. Alternatives — Is there a simpler or better approach?
5. Security — Any security concerns?

Be specific and actionable. If the plan is solid, end with exactly: VERDICT: APPROVED
If changes are needed, end with exactly: VERDICT: REVISE" \
  > /tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.json

Extract session ID and review text (requires jq):

CURSOR_SESSION_ID=$(jq -r '.session_id' /tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.json)
jq -r '.result' /tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.json > /tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.md

If jq is not installed, inform the user: brew install jq (macOS) or equivalent.

Step 4: Read Review & Check Verdict

1. Read /tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.md
2. Present review to the user:

## Plan Review — Round N (reviewer: ${REVIEWER_CLI} / ${REVIEWER_MODEL})

[Reviewer feedback]

3. Check verdict:
   • VERDICT: APPROVED → proceed to Phase 8 (Initialize workspace)
   • VERDICT: REVISE → go to Step 5
   • No clear verdict but positive / no actionable items → treat as approved
   • Max rounds (5) reached → proceed with warning

Step 5: Revise the Plan

Address each issue the reviewer raised. Update the plan in conversation context and rewrite /tmp/plan-${REVIEW_ID}.md.

Summarize revisions for the user:

### Revisions (Round N)
- [Change and reason, one bullet per issue addressed]

If a revision contradicts the user's explicit requirements, skip it and note it for the user.

Step 6: Re-submit to Reviewer (Rounds 2-5)

If REVIEWER_CLI is codex:

Resume the existing session:

codex exec resume ${CODEX_SESSION_ID} \
  -o /tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.md \
  "I've revised the plan based on your feedback. Updated plan is in /tmp/plan-${REVIEW_ID}.md.

Changes made:
[List specific changes]

Re-review. If solid, end with: VERDICT: APPROVED
If more changes needed, end with: VERDICT: REVISE"

If resume fails (session expired), fall back to fresh codex exec with context about prior rounds.

If REVIEWER_CLI is claude:

Fresh call with accumulated context (Claude CLI has no session resume):

claude -p \
  "You previously reviewed an implementation plan and requested revisions.

Previous feedback summary: [key points from last review]

I've revised the plan. Updated version is in /tmp/plan-${REVIEW_ID}.md.

Changes made:
[List specific changes]

Re-review the full plan. If solid, end with: VERDICT: APPROVED
If more changes needed, end with: VERDICT: REVISE" \
  --model ${REVIEWER_MODEL} \
  --allowedTools Read \
  > /tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.md

If REVIEWER_CLI is cursor:

Resume the existing session:

cursor-agent --resume ${CURSOR_SESSION_ID} -p \
  --mode=ask \
  --model ${REVIEWER_MODEL} \
  --trust \
  --output-format json \
  "I've revised the plan based on your feedback. Updated plan is in /tmp/plan-${REVIEW_ID}.md.

Changes made:
[List specific changes]

Re-review. If solid, end with: VERDICT: APPROVED
If more changes needed, end with: VERDICT: REVISE" \
  > /tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.json

jq -r '.result' /tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.json > /tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.md

If resume fails, fall back to fresh cursor-agent -p with context about prior rounds.

Return to Step 4.

Step 7: Present Final Result

## Plan Review — Final (reviewer: ${REVIEWER_CLI} / ${REVIEWER_MODEL})

**Status:** Approved after N round(s)
[or]
**Status:** Max rounds (5) reached — not fully approved

[Final feedback / remaining concerns]

Step 8: Cleanup

rm -f /tmp/plan-${REVIEW_ID}.md /tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.md /tmp/plan-review-${REVIEW_ID}.json

Phase 8: Initialize Local Plan Workspace (MANDATORY)

At project root:

1. Ensure ai_plan/ exists. Create it if missing.
2. Ensure .gitignore contains /ai_plan/.
3. If .gitignore was changed, commit that change immediately (local commit only).

Recommended commit message:

• chore(gitignore): ignore ai_plan local planning artifacts

Phase 9: Generate Plan Files (MANDATORY)

Create ai_plan/YYYY-MM-DD-<short-title>/ with ALL files:

1. original-plan.md - copy of original planner-generated plan.
2. final-transcript.md - copy of final planning transcript used to reach approved plan.
3. milestone-plan.md - full implementation spec (template-based).
4. story-tracker.md - status tracking (template-based, all stories start as pending).
5. continuation-runbook.md - resume context and execution protocol (template-based).

Use templates from this skill's templates/ folder.

Phase 10: Handoff

Always instruct the executing agent:

Read ai_plan/YYYY-MM-DD-<short-title>/continuation-runbook.md first, then execute from ai_plan files only.

Tracker Discipline (MANDATORY)

Before starting any story:

1. Open story-tracker.md
2. Mark story in-dev
3. Add notes if relevant
4. Then begin implementation

After completing any story:

1. Mark story completed
2. Add commit hash in Notes
3. Review pending stories
4. Update Last Updated and Stories Complete counts

Execution Rules to Include in Plan (MANDATORY)

• Run lint/typecheck/tests after each milestone.
• Prefer linting changed files only for speed.
• Commit locally after each completed milestone (do not push).
• Stop and ask user for feedback.
• Apply feedback, rerun checks, and commit again.
• Move to next milestone only after user approval.
• After all milestones are completed and approved, ask permission to push.
• Only after approved push: mark plan as completed.

Gitignore Note

ai_plan/ is intentionally local and must stay gitignored. Do not treat inability to commit plan-file updates in ai_plan/ as a problem.

Verification Checklist

• ai_plan/ exists at project root
• .gitignore includes /ai_plan/
• .gitignore ignore-rule commit was created if needed
• Plan directory created under ai_plan/YYYY-MM-DD-<short-title>/
• Reviewer configured or explicitly skipped
• Plan review completed (approved or max rounds) — or skipped
• original-plan.md present
• final-transcript.md present
• milestone-plan.md present
• story-tracker.md created with all stories as pending
• continuation-runbook.md present
• Handoff explicitly says to read runbook first and execute from plan folder

Exit Triggers for Question Phase

User says: "ready", "done", "let's plan", "proceed", "enough questions"