feat(flight-finder): implement milestone M2 - report workflow and delivery gates
This commit is contained in:
55
docs/flight-finder.md
Normal file
55
docs/flight-finder.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
||||
# flight-finder
|
||||
|
||||
Reusable flight-search report skill for OpenClaw. It replaces the brittle one-off `dfw-blq-2026.md` prompt with typed intake, bounded source orchestration, explicit report gates, fixed-template PDF output, and Luke-sender email delivery.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core behavior
|
||||
|
||||
`flight-finder` is designed to:
|
||||
|
||||
- collect missing trip inputs explicitly instead of relying on hardcoded prompt prose
|
||||
- support split returns, flexible dates, passenger groups, and exclusions
|
||||
- use bounded search phases across KAYAK, Skyscanner, Expedia, and a best-effort airline direct cross-check
|
||||
- normalize pricing to USD before ranking
|
||||
- produce a report payload first, then render PDF/email only when the report is complete
|
||||
- behave safely on WhatsApp-style chat surfaces by treating status nudges as updates, not resets
|
||||
|
||||
## Important rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Recipient email is a delivery gate, not a search gate.
|
||||
- `marketCountry` is explicit-only in this implementation pass.
|
||||
- It must be an ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 uppercase code such as `TH` or `DE`.
|
||||
- If present, it activates VPN only for the bounded search phase.
|
||||
- If omitted, no VPN change happens.
|
||||
- If VPN connect or verification fails, the run falls back to the default market and records a degraded warning instead of hanging.
|
||||
- Direct-airline cross-checking is currently best-effort, not a hard blocker.
|
||||
|
||||
## Helper package
|
||||
|
||||
From `skills/flight-finder/`:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
npm install
|
||||
npm run normalize-request -- --legacy-dfw-blq
|
||||
npm run normalize-request -- --input "<request.json>"
|
||||
npm run report-status -- --input "<report-payload.json>"
|
||||
npm run render-report -- --input "<report-payload.json>" --output "<report.pdf>"
|
||||
npm run delivery-plan -- --to "<recipient@example.com>" --subject "<subject>" --body "<body>" --attach "<report.pdf>"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Delivery
|
||||
|
||||
- sender identity: `luke@fiorinis.com`
|
||||
- send path:
|
||||
- `zsh ~/.openclaw/workspace/bin/gog-luke gmail send --to "<target>" --subject "<subject>" --body "<body>" --attach "<pdf-path>"`
|
||||
- if the user already provided the destination email, that counts as delivery authorization once the report is ready
|
||||
|
||||
## Source viability for implementation pass 1
|
||||
|
||||
Bounded checks on Stefano's MacBook Air showed:
|
||||
|
||||
- `KAYAK`: viable
|
||||
- `Skyscanner`: viable
|
||||
- `Expedia`: viable
|
||||
- airline direct-booking cross-check: degraded / best-effort
|
||||
|
||||
That means the first implementation pass should rely primarily on the three aggregator sources and treat direct-airline confirmation as additive evidence when it succeeds.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user