Require explicit photo-review status in property assessments
This commit is contained in:
@@ -121,6 +121,18 @@ If photos are weak, incomplete, blocked, or the gallery automation fails:
|
||||
- avoid strong condition claims
|
||||
- do not infer turnkey condition from marketing text alone
|
||||
|
||||
### Mandatory photo-review rule
|
||||
|
||||
If an accessible all-photos view, photo grid, photo page, or fallback source exists, photo review is **required** before making condition claims.
|
||||
Do not silently skip photos just because pricing, comps, or carrying-cost analysis can proceed without them.
|
||||
|
||||
The final assessment must explicitly include one line in the output:
|
||||
- `Photo review: completed via <source>`
|
||||
- or `Photo review: not completed`
|
||||
|
||||
If completed, briefly summarize the condition read from the photos.
|
||||
If not completed, mark condition confidence as limited and say why.
|
||||
|
||||
## Normalization / make-ready adjustment
|
||||
|
||||
Estimate a rough make-ready budget when condition is not turnkey. The goal is not contractor precision; the goal is apples-to-apples comparison.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user